ENTRAR            

		Artículos de revisión
		Profesionalismo en enfermería: una revisión de la literatura C. Luengo-Martínez,1 T. Paravic-Klijn,2 M. Burgos-Moreno2 1Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad del Bío Bío, Chillán, Chile. 2Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile Manuscrito recibido en 08 septiembre 2016 Manuscrito aceptado en 07 febrero 2017 Enferm Universitaria -Mex- 2017; 14(2): 131-142
Cómo citar este documento
Luengo-Martínez, C.; Paravic-Klijn, T.; Burgos-Moreno, M. Profesionalismo en enfermería: una revisión de la literatura. Enferm Universitaria -Mex-, 2017 abr-jun, 14(2). Disponible en <https://www.index-f.com/reu/14/131142.php> Consultado el

Resumen El profesionalismo en enfermería ha sido descrito como un factor que determina en mayor medida la calidad de la atención en el medio hospitalario. Objetivo. Determinar el nivel de profesionalismo de las enfermeras/os reportado por la literatura como elemento fundamental para entregar un cuidado de calidad. Método. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura científica en diferentes bases de datos internacionales, de los últimos 10años, de acuerdo a las indicaciones del Manual Cochrane e informe PRISMA. La valoración de la calidad metodológica de los artículos se realizó mediante el instrumento Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). Resultados. Se seleccionaron 11 estudios que hacen referencia al nivel de profesionalismo de las enfermeras/os, el cual está en rangos disímiles en los diferentes países, pero se observó una concordancia en que la autonomía profesional, la publicación y la comunicación reflejaron los índices más bajos de profesionalismo. Conclusión. El nivel de profesionalismo de enfermería varía en los diferentes países. Conocer las áreas de mayor y menor déficit profesional es importante para establecer estrategias de abordaje para su mejora. El profesional de enfermería debe avanzar en el logro de elevados niveles de profesionalismo, obtener plena autonomía profesional, publicar y participar activamente en organizaciones profesionales. Palabras clave: Enfermería/ Profesionalismo/ Competencia profesional/ Autonomía profesional/ Revisión sistemática/ Chile.   Abstract Professionalism in nursing: A literature review Professionalism in nursing has been described as a factor which widely determines the quality of attention in the hospital environment. Objective. To determine the level of professionalism among nurses as reported by the literature. Method. A literature review was conducted on different international databases following the Cochrane Manual and the PRISMA inform, and considering only the last 10years. The methodology quality of the articles was assessed through the Effective Public Health Practice Project instrument (EPHPP). Results. Eleven studies making reference to the level of nursing professionalism were selected. The levels of professionalism differed among the countries, but a concordance was observed regarding professional autonomy. The publishing and communication areas reflected the lowest levels of professionalism. Conclusion. The level of professionalism in nursing varies among countries; and knowing the areas with highest and lowest levels is important to develop strategies to address the issue. The nursing professionals should foster their professionalism, their autonomy, their publishing activities, and their participation in professional organizations. Key-words: Nursing/ Professionalism/ Professional competence/ Professional autonomy/ Systematic review/ Chile.   Resumo Profissionalismo na enfermagem: uma revisão da literatura O profissionalismo em enfermagem tem sido descrito como um fator que determina em maior medida a qualidade de atenção no médio hospitalar. Objetivo. Determinar o nível de profissionalismo das enfermeiras/os reportado pela literatura como elemento fundamental para entregar um cuidado de qualidade. Método. Realizou-se uma revisão de literatura científica em diferentes bases de dados internacionais, dos últimos dez anos, de acordo às indicações do Manual Cochrane e relatório PRISMA. A valorização da qualidade metodológica dos artigos realizou-se mediante o instrumento Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). Resultados. Selecionaram-se 11 estudos que fazem referência ao nível de profissionalismo das enfermeiras/os, o qual está em faixas dissimiles nos diferentes países, mas, observou-se uma concordância em que a autonomia profissional, a publicação e comunicação refletiram os índices mais baixos de profissionalismo. Conclusão. O nível de profissionalismo de enfermagem varia nos diferentes países, conhecer as áreas de maior e menor déficit profissional, assim como estabelecer estratégias de abordagem para sua melhora. O profissional de enfermagem deve avançar na realização de elevados níveis de profissionalismo, obter plena autonomia profissional, publicar e participar ativamente em organizações profissionais. Palavras chave: Enfermagem/ Profissionalismo/ Competência profissional/ Autonomia profissional/ Revisão sistemática/ Chile.

Bibliografía 1. Borré Y, Lenis C, González G. Utilidad del cuestionario SERVQHOS-E para medir calidad percibida de la atención de enfermería. CES Salud Pública. 2014;5:127-36. 2. Freitas J, Silva A, Minamisava R, et al. Calidad de los cuidados de enfermería y satisfacción del paciente atendido en un hospital de ense~nanza. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2014;22:454-60, https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3241.2437 3. Vituri D, Matsuda L. Validac¸ão de conteúdo de indicadores de qualidade para avaliac¸ão do cuidado de enfermagem. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43:429-37, https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000200024 4. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83:691-729. 5. Grupo de Cuidado, Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Cuidado y práctica de Enfermería: nuevos avances conceptuales del grupo de cuidado. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2006. 6. Grupo de Cuidado, Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Dimensiones del Cuidado. Bogotá: Unibiblios; 1998. 7. Fantahun A, Demessie A, Gebrekirstos K, et al. A cross sectional study on factors influencing professionalism in nursing among nurses in Mekelle Public Hospitals, North Ethiopia, 2012. BMC Nursing. 2014;13, https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-13-10 8. O'Sullivan H, van Mook W, Fewtrell R, et al. Integrating professionalism into the curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 61. Teach Med. 2012;34:e64-77, https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.655610 9. Vollmer H, Mills D. Professionalization. En: Snizek W, editor. Hall's Professionalism Scale: An empirical reassessment, 37. Am Sociol Rev.; 1972. p. 109-14. 10. Hoyle E. Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. En: Evans L, editor. Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals, 56. Br J Educ Stud.; 2008. p. 20-38. 11. Troman G. The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers' work and professionalism. Brit J Sociol Educ. 1996;17:473-87. 12. Sockett HT (1996) Citado en:.Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. Br J Educ Stud. 2008;56:20-38. 13. Hoyle E. Teaching: Prestige, status and esteem. Educational Management & Administration. 2001;29:139-52. 14. Briggs ARJ. Professionalism in further education: A changing concept. MiE. 2005;19:19-23. 15. Krackov S, Pohl H. Enseñanza y evaluación del profesionalismo en educación médica. En: Wright A, editor. La conferencia de Ottawa 2004 en Barcelona: una síntesis personal, 2. Rev Educ Cienc Salud; 2005. p. 9-16. 16. Larriviere D, Beresford HR. Professionalism in neurology: The role of law. Neurology. 2008;71:1283-8, https://dxdoi.org/121210./01.wnl0000327605.40374.49. 17. Dinger M, Thatcher J, Treadway D, et al. Does professionalism matter in the IT Workforce? An empirical examination of IT professionals. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;16:281-313. 18. Lombarts K, Plochg T, Thompson C, et al. On behalf of the DUQuE Project Consortium. Measuring professionalism in medicine and nursing: results of a European Survey. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e97069, https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097069 19. Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SRG, et al. A systematic review of studies assessing and facilitating attitudes towards professionalism in medicine. Med Educ. 2007;41:822-9. 20. Fox CJ. What do we mean when we say professionalism? A language usage analysis for public administration. Am Rev Public Adm. 1992;22:1-17, doi: doi/abs/10.1177/027507409202200101. 21. Ozga J. Deskilling a profession: Professionalism, deprofessionalisation and the new managerialism. En: Evans L, editor. Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals, 56. Br J Educ Stud.; 2008. p. 20-38. 22. Hall RH. Professionalization and bureaucratization. Am Sociol Rev. 1968;33:92-104, https://bit.ly/2fjnUEq. 23. Miller BK, Adams D, Beck L. A behavioral inventory for professionalism in nursing. J Nurs Prof. 1993;9:290-5, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/8755-7223(93)90055-H 24. Blank L, Kimball H, McDonald W, et al. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: A physician charter 15 months later. Ann Inter Med. 2003;138:839-41, https://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-10-200305200-00012 25. Patiño J. Profesionalismo en enfermería. Actual Enferm. 2014;14. 26. Wynd C. Current factors contributing to professionalism in nursing. J Prof Nurs. 2003;19:251-61, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00104-2 27. Hwang J, Lou F, Han SS, et al. Professionalism: The major factor influencing job satisfaction among Korean and Chinese nurses. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56:313-8, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00710.x 28. Letelier M, Velandia AL. Profesionalismo en Enfermería, el hábito de la excelencia en el cuidado. Av Enferm. 2010;28:145-58. 29. Higgins JPT, Green S. (edit.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 UK: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 [consultado Ago 2016]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2jvMiad. 30. Urrutia G, BonFill X. Declaración PRISMA: propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;135:507-11, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015 31. Effective Public Health Practice Project. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Ontario: EPHPP, 2010 [consultado Ago 2016]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2estLrW. 32. Dikmen Y, Karatas¸ H, Arslan GG, et al. The level of professionalism of nurses working in a hospital in Turkey. J Caring Sci. 2016;5:95-102, https://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2016.010 33. Jang I, Kim Y, Kim K. Professionalism and professional quality of life for oncology nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:2835-45, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13330 34. Tanaka M, Taketomi K, Yonemitsu Y, et al. Professional behaviours and factors contributing to nursing professionalism among nurse managers. J Nurs Manag. 2014;24:12-20, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12264 35. Tanaka M, Yonemitsu Y, Kawamoto R. Nursing professionalism: A national survey of professionalism among Japanese nurses. Int J Nurs Pract. 2014;20:579-87, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12201 36. Konukbay D, Yildiz D, Eren B, et al. Determination of professional behaviours of nurses working in an educational and research hospital. IJCS. 2014;7:633-41. 37. C¸elik S, Hisar F. The influence of the professionalism behaviour of nurses working in health institutions on job satisfaction. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18:180-7, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02019.x 38. Kim-Godwin YS, Baek HC, Wynd C. Factors influencing professionalism in nursing among Korean American registered nurses. J Nurs Prof. 2010;26:242-9, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.12.007 39. Karadag A, Hisar F, Elbas NO. The level of professionalism among nurses in Turkey. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39:371-4, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00195.x 40. Hampton G, Hampton D. Relationship of professionalism, rewards, market orientation and job satisfaction among medical professionals the case of Certified Nurse-Midwives. J Bus Res. 2004;57:1042-53, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00356-9 41. Wynd C. Current factors contributing to professionalism in nursing. J Prof Nurs. 2003;19:251-61, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(03) 00104-2 42. Maas L, Raile M. Quality nursing care in the words of nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66:1689-97, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05344.x 43. Tan M, Akgün Sahin Z, Kardas Özdemir F. Barriers of research utilization from the perspective of nurses in Eastern Turkey. Nurs Outlook. 2012;60:44-50, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2011.07.002 44. Puntunet BM, Domínguez BA. La educación continua y la capacitación del profesional de enfermería. Rev Mex Enf Cardiol. 2008;16:115-7. 45. Chakraborty N, Sinha BN, Nizamie SH, et al. Effectiveness of continuing nursing education program in child psychiatry. J Child Adolesc Psychiatric Nurs. 2006;19:21-8, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2006.00039.x 46. Snizek WE. Hall's Professionalism Scale: An empirical reassessment. Am Sociol Rev. 1972;37:109-14, https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2093498 47. Joel LA. Kelly's Dimension of Professional Nursing. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995. p. 192-232. 48. Oweiss AI. Bringing the professional challenges for nursing in Jordan to light. Int J Nurs Prac. 2005;11:244-9, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2005.00536.x 49. Tapp D, Stansfield K, Stewart J. La autonomía en la práctica de enfermería. Aquichan. 2005;5:114-27. 50. Luengo C, Paravic T. Autonomía profesional. Factor clave para el ejercicio de la enfermería basada en la evidencia. Index Enferm. 2016;25(1-2):42-6. 51. Martínez-Riera JR. Barreras e instrumentos facilitadores de la enfermería basada en la evidencia. Enferm Clin. 2003;13:303-8, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1130-8621(03)73825-X

	RECURSOS CUIDEN		RECURSOS CIBERINDEX		FUNDACION INDEX		GRUPOS DE INVESTIGACION
	CUIDEN CUIDEN citación REHIC Revistas incluidas Como incluir documentos Glosario de documentos periódicos Glosario de documentos no periódicos Certificar producción		Hemeroteca Cantárida El Rincón del Investigador Otras BDB Campus FINDEX Florence Pro-AKADEMIA Instrúye-T		¿Quiénes somos? RICO Red de Centros Colaboradores Convenios Casa de Mágina MINERVA Jóvenes investigadores Publicaciones Consultoría		INVESCOM Salud Comunitaria LIC Laboratorio de Investigación Cualitativa OEBE Observatorio de Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia GED Investigación bibliométrica y documental Grupo Aurora Mas de Investigación en Cuidados e Historia FORESTOMA Living Lab Enfermería en Estomaterapia CIBERE Consejo Iberoamericano de Editores de Revistas de Enfermería