ENTRAR            

 


 

Enfermer�a Universitaria ISSN: 1655-7063 v13n2 114123r

 

 

 

ARTÍCULO DE REVISIÓN

 

 

 Ir a Sumario

 

 

 

Acoso laboral entre personal de enfermería

M.M. Molero Jurado, M.C. Pérez-Fuentes, J.J. Gázquez Linares
Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Almería, Almería, España

Manuscrito recibido en 13 agosto 2015
Manuscrito aceptado en 21 enero 2016

Enferm Universitaria -Mex- 2016; 13(2): 114-123

 

 

 

Cómo citar este documento

Molero Jurado, M.M.; Pérez-Fuentes, M.C.; Gázquez Linares, J.J. Acoso laboral entre personal de enfermería. Enferm Universitaria -Mex-, 2016 ene-mar, 13(2). Disponible en <https://www.index-f.com/reu/13/114123.php> Consultado el

 

Resumen

Objetivo: Analizar los trabajos, sobre el acoso entre profesionales de enfermería: prevalencia, factores de riesgo y consecuencias. Método: Revisión sistemática de las publicaciones científicas sobre el acoso entre el personal de enfermería, en la última década. Se consultaron diferentes bases de datos nacionales (Dialnet, ISOC Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, IME Biomedicina) e internacionales (CINHAL, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed Central), así como directorios de revistas con acceso abierto (DOAJ). En todos los casos, se limitó la búsqueda al intervalo 2005-2014. Los criterios establecidos fueron: 1) Estudios que analicen el acoso laboral entre el personal de enfermería; 2) Cualquier diseño metodológico; 3) Que aporten datos empíricos sobre el estado de la cuestión; 4) Con acceso al texto completo; y, 5) Escritos en inglés, español o portugués. De un total de 96 publicaciones, fueron seleccionadas 18. Resultados: Los resultados muestran una prevalencia de acoso, entre el personal de enfermería, en torno al 17-20%. Se identifican factores de riesgo como: edad inferior a 30 años, corta trayectoria profesional, y trabajar en determinadas unidades o turnos. Las consecuencias para la víctima fueron: problemas psicológicos, bajo rendimiento y deterioro de relaciones sociales. Conclusiones: Destacar la escasa producción científica sobre el tema, y la necesidad de desarrollar instrumentos, que permitan una evaluación ajustada de las conductas de intimidación y acoso, entre profesionales de la enfermería.
Palabras clave: Enfermería/ Acoso psicológico/ Mobbing/ Violencia laboral/ Revisión sistemática/ Literatura de revisión como asunto/ España.
 

Abstract
Mobbing among nursing staff

Objective: to analyze studies on mobbing among nursing professionals, risk factors, and consequences. Method: this is a systematic review of scientific works on mobbing among nursing staff published during the last decade (2005-2014). National (Dialnet, ISOC Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, IME Biomedicina) and international (CINHAL, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed Central) databases, as well as directories of open access journals were consulted. Established criteria were: 1) studies analyzing mobbing among nursing staff; 2) any methodological design; 3) offering empirical data on the topic; 4) access to the full text; 5) written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese.  From a total of 96 studies identified, 18 were finally selected. Results: the findings show a prevalence of mobbing among nursing staff of around 17-20%. Risk factors such as age younger than 30 years old, brief professional trajectory, and being working in specific units or shifts were identified. Among the consequences, psychological problems, low productivity, and social relations deteriorations were identified. Conclusions: it is important to highlight the scanty scientific production on the topic, and also the necessity to develop instruments which allow an adequate assessment of harassment conducts among nursing professionals.
Key-words:
 Nursing/ Psychological harassment/ Mobbing/ Workplace violence/ Systematic review/ Review literature as a topic/ Spain.
 

Resumo
Assédio laboral entre trabalhadores de enfermagem

Objetivo: Analisar os trabalhos sobre o assédio entre profissionais de enfermagem: prevalência, fatores de risco e consequências. Método: revisão sistemática das publicações científicas sobre o assédio entre os trabalhadores de enfermagem na última década. Consultaram-se diferentes bases de dados nacionais (Dialnet ISOC Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, IME Biomedicina) e internacionais (CINHAL, Medline, PsycINFO, PubMed Central), assim como diretórios de revistas com livre acesso (DOAJ). Em todos os casos, limitou-se à busca do intervalo de 2005-2014. Os critérios estabelecidos foram: 1) Estudos que analisem o assédio laboral entre os trabalhadores de enfermagem, 2) Qualquer desenho metodológico, 3) Que aportem dados empíricos sobre o estado da questão, 4) Com acesso ao texto completo, e, 5) Escritos em inglês, espanhol e português. De um total de 96 publicações, foram escolhidas 18. Resultados: Os resultados mostram uma prevalência de assédio, entre os trabalhadores de enfermagem, em volta a 17-20%. Identificam-se fatores de risco como: idade inferior a 30 anos, curta trajetória professional, e trabalhar em determinadas unidades ou turnos. As consequências para a vítima foram: problemas psicológicos, baixo rendimento e deterioro de relações sociais. Conclusões: Destacar a escassa produção científica de enfermagem sobre o tema, e a necessidade de desenvolver instrumentos, que permitam uma avaliação ajustada das condutas de intimidação e assédio, entre profissionais da enfermagem.
Palavras chave: Enfermagem/ Assédio psicológico/ Mobbing/ Violência no Trabalho/ Revisão sistemática/ Literatura de Revisão como Assunto/ Espanha.

 

Referencias

1. Leymann H. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence Vict 1990; 5(2): 119-26.

2. Leymann H. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organl Psy 1996; 5: 165-84.

3. Yildirim D. Bullying among nurses and its effects. Int Nurs Rev 2009; 56(4): 504-11.

4. Pavlakis A, Kaitelidou D, Theodorou M, et al. Conflict management in public hospitals: the Cyprus case. Int Nurs Rev 2011; 58(2): 242-8.

5. Esmaeilpour M, Salsali M y Ahmadi F. Workplace violence against Iranian nurses working in emergency departments. Int Nurs Rev 2011; 58(1), 130-7.

6. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. The concept of bullying and harassment at work: the European tradition. En: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edition, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011. P. 3-40.

7. Hershcovis MS. "Incivility, social undermining, bullying...oh my!" A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. J Organiz Behav 2010; 32(3): 499-519.

8. Agervold M. Bullying at work: A discussion of definitions and prevalence, based on an empirical study. Scand J Psychol 2007; 48(2): 161-72.

9. Nielsen MB, Matthiesen SB y Einarsen S. The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta-analysis. J Occup Organ Psych 2010; 83(4): 955-79.

10. Bartlett JE y Bartlett ME. Workplace Bullying: An Integrative Literature Review. Adv. Develop. Hum. Resour. 2011; 13(1): 69-84.

11. Johnson SL. International perspectives on workplace bullying among nurses: a review. Int Nurs Rev 2009; 56(1): 34-40.

12. Martínez JP, Méndez I y García-Sevilla J. Burnout y empatía en cuidadores profesionales de personas mayores.  Eur j investig health psychol educ 2015; 5(3): 325-333.

13. Gastaldi FG, Pasta T, Longobardi C, et al. Measuring the influence of stress and burnout in teacher-child relationship. Eur J educ psychol 2014; 7(1): 17-28.

14. Lewis MA. Nurse bulling: organizational considerations in the maintenance and perpetration of health-care bulling cultures. J Nurs Manag 2006; 14(1): 52-8.

15. Hutchinson M, Wilkes L, Jackson D, et al. Integrating individual, work group and organisational factors: testing a multidimensional model of mobbing in the nursing workplace. J Nurs Manag 2010; 18(2): 173-81.

16. Inglés CJ, Torregrosa MS, García-Fernández JM, et al. Conducta agresiva e inteligencia emocional en la adolescencia. Eur J educ psychol 2014; 7(1): 29-41.

17. Organización Mundial de la Salud. International Action Needed to Increase Health Workforce. Ginebra: OMS Media centre 2007. (Consultado 12 mayo 2015). Disponible en: https://bit.ly/1Po2zlH

18. Büscher A, Sivertsen B, White J. Nurses and Midwives: A force for health. Survey on the situation of nursing and midwifery in the member states of the European region of the World Health Organization 2009. Copenhagen: OMS; 2010.

19. Einarsen S, Gemzoe E. Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. En: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace. International Perspectives in Research and Practice. London: Taylor & Francis; 2003. P. 127-44.

20. Leymann H y Gustafsson A. Mobbing at work and the development of posttraumatic stress disorders. Eur J Work Organ Psychol  1996; 5(2): 251-75.

21. Gemzoe E y Einarsen S. Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2001; 10(4): 393-413.

22. Lallukka T, Haukka J, Partonen T, et al. Workplace bullying and subsequent psychotropic medication: a cohort study with register linkages. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e001660.

23. Carmona JM, Baena AM, Berral AC, et al. Análisis del conocimiento sobre la administración de fármacos. Eur j investig health psychol educ 2015; 5(2): 233-41.

24. Hogh A, Gemzoe E y Hansen AM. Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. En: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. Workplace Bullying: Development in Theory, Research and Practice London: CRC Press; 2011.P. 107-128.

25. Zapf D, Knorz C y Kulla M. On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. Eur J Work Organ Psycho1996; 5(2): 215-37.

26. Nacimiento Rodríguez L, Mora-Merchán JA. El uso de estrategias de afrontamiento y habilidades metacognitivas ante situaciones de bullying y cyberbullying. Eur j educ psychol 2014; 7(2): 121-9.

27. Vartia MA. Consequences of workplace bullying and respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001; 27(1): 63-69.

28. Bernalte V. Minoría de hombres en la profesión de enfermería. Reflexiones sobre su historia, imagen y evolución en España. Enfermería Glob 2015; 37(1): 328-34.

29. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Estadística de Profesionales Sanitarios Colegiados. Año 2014. Madrid: INE [Notas de prensa]. [Consultado 12 mayo 2015]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/1PodCLO

30. Campanini P, Punzi S, Carissimi E, et al. [Gender differences in workplace bullying]. Med Lav. 2006; 97(5): 699-706.

31. Djurkovic N, McCormack D y Casimir G. Workplace bullying and intention to leave: the moderating effect of perceived organisational support. Hum Resource Manag J 2008; 18(4): 405-22.

32. Branch S, Ramsay S y Barker M. Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review. . Int. J. Manag. Rev 2013; 15(3): 280-99.

33. Milutinovic D, Prokes B, Gavrilov-Jerkovié V, et al. [Mobbing: special reference to the nursing profession]. Med pregl 2009; 62(11-12): 529-33.

34. Simons SR, Stark RB y De Marco RF. A new, four-item instrument to measure workplace bullying. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34(2): 132-40.

35. Bailar JC. The practice of meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48(1): 149-57.

36. Yildirim D, Yildirim A y Timucin A. Mobbing behaviors encountered by nurse teaching staff. Nurs Ethics 2007; 14(4): 447-63.

37. Carter M, Thompson N, Crampton P, et al. Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: a questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to reporting. BMJ Open 2013; 3(6): 26-8.

38. Korhan EA, Guler EK, Khorshid L, et al. Mobbing Experienced by Nurses Working in Hospitals: An Example of Turkey. International Journal of Caring Sciences 2014; 7(2): 642-51.

39. Losa Iglesias ME, Becerro de Bengoa R. Prevalence of bullying at work and its association with self-esteem scores in a Spanish nurse simple. Contemp Nurse 2012; 42(1): 2-10.

40. Ozturk H, Sokmen S, Yilmaz F, et al. Measuring mobbing experiences of academic nurses: Development of a mobbing scale. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008; 20(9): 435-42.

41. Fornés-Vives J, Martínez-Abascal MA y García-Banda G. Variables socioprofesionales implicadas en el hostigamiento psicológico en enfermería. Enferm clín 2008; 18(3): 127-33.

42. Berry PA, Gillespie GL, Gates D, et al. Novice Nurse Productivity Following Workplace Bullying. J Nurs Scholarsh 2012; 44(1): 80-7.

43. Esfahani AN, Shahbazi G. Workplace bullying in nursing: The case of Azerbaijan province, Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014; 19(4): 409-15.

44. Pai HC y Lee S. Risk factors for workplace violence in clinical registered nurses in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20(9-10): 1405-12.

45. Çevik A, Tan M, Saritas S, et al. Levels of mobbing perception among nurses in Eastern Turkey. Int Nurs Rev 2012; 59(3): 402-8.

46. Efe SY, Ayaz S. Mobbing against nurses in the workplace in Turkey. Int Nurs Rev 2010; 57(3): 328-34.

47. Fonseca DM y Santos AS. Mobbing em contexto de enfermagem. Referência 2011; 3(5): 89-93.

48. Budin WC, Brewer CS, Chao YY, et al. Verbal Abuse From Nurse Colleagues and Work Environment of Early Career Registered Nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh 2013; 45(3): 308-16.

49. Bortoluzzi G, Caporale L, Palese A. Does participative leadership reduce the onset of mobbing risk among nurse working teams? J Nurs Manag 2014; 22(5): 643-52.

50. Trepanier S, Fernet C, Austin S. Workplace bullying and psychological health at work: The mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Work & Stress 2013; 27(2): 123-140.

51. Topa G y Moriano JA. Stress and nurses' horizontal mobbing: Moderating effects of group identity and group support. Nurs outlook 2013; 6(1): 25-31.

52. Dilek Y, Aytolan Y. Development and psychometric evaluation of workplace psychologically violent behaviours instrument. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17(10): 1361-70.

 

Principio de p�gina 

Pie Doc

 

RECURSOS CUIDEN

 

RECURSOS CIBERINDEX

 

FUNDACION INDEX

 

GRUPOS DE INVESTIGACION

 

CUIDEN
CUIDEN citación

REHIC Revistas incluidas
Como incluir documentos
Glosario de documentos periódicos
Glosario de documentos no periódicos
Certificar producción
 

 

Hemeroteca Cantárida
El Rincón del Investigador
Otras BDB
Campus FINDEX
Florence
Pro-AKADEMIA
Instrúye-T

 

¿Quiénes somos?
RICO Red de Centros Colaboradores
Convenios
Casa de Mágina
MINERVA Jóvenes investigadores
Publicaciones
Consultoría

 

INVESCOM Salud Comunitaria
LIC Laboratorio de Investigación Cualitativa
OEBE Observatorio de Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia
GED Investigación bibliométrica y documental
Grupo Aurora Mas de Investigación en Cuidados e Historia
FORESTOMA Living Lab Enfermería en Estomaterapia
CIBERE Consejo Iberoamericano de Editores de Revistas de Enfermería