BUSCAR CUIDEN SUMMA CUIDEN CANTARIDA

Resumo

Enquadramento: O debriefing é uma forma estruturada de conduzir os formandos na reflexão sobre a ação, oferecendo uma realidade, através dos seus olhos, do formador e seus pares. Numa simulação, o debriefing é parte fundamental, à qual se deve dedicar tanta atenção como à resolução do cenário. Uma ferramenta que permita avaliar a qualidade do debriefing, na perspetiva do formando, é importante para a investigação e melhoria contínua da qualidade.
Objetivos: Construir e validar uma escala de avaliação do debriefing associado à simulação.
Metodologia: Estudo de investigação metodológica. Foi desenvolvida uma lista de 50 itens, através de revisão da literatura e experiência dos investigadores, na forma de questionário, a 209 estudantes do Curso de Licenciatura em Enfermagem.
Resultados: Após análise das respostas, resultou uma escala com 34 itens, com elevada consistência interna (Alpha = 0,899). A análise fatorial sugere divisão em três fatores, todos com elevados valores de Alpha e com significado racional.
Conclusão: A versão final da escala apresenta boas propriedades psicométricas, revelando potencial para utilização em investigações futuras.
Palavras-chave: Debriefing/ Simulação/ Simulação de paciente/ Estudos de validação.
 

Resumen
Construcción y validación de una Escala para la Evaluación del Debriefing asociado a la Simulación (EADaS)

Marco contextual: El debriefing es una forma estructurada de conducir a los alumnos en la reflexión sobre la acción, ofreciendo una realidad, una manera de verse con sus propios ojos, los del profesor y sus compañeros. En una simulación, el debriefing es la pieza clave a la cual alumnos y profesores deben dedicar tanta atención como a la resolución de la práctica. Tener una herramienta para evaluar la calidad del debriefing en la perspectiva del alumno es importante para la investigación y para la mejora continua de la calidad.
Objetivo: Construcción y validación de una escala para la evaluación del debriefing asociado a la simulación.
Metodología: Investigación metodológica. Se desarrolló una lista de 50 ítems a partir de la revisión de la literatura y la experiencia de los investigadores y se aplicó, en forma de cuestionario, a 209 estudiantes de la Licenciatura en Enfermería.
Resultados: Del análisis de las respuestas resultó una escala con 34 ítems, con una alta consistencia interna (Alpha = 0,899). El análisis factorial sugiere una división en tres factores, todos con altos valores de Alpha y con significado racional.
Conclusión: Podemos decir que la versión final de la escala presenta buenas propiedades psicométricas, lo que demuestra su potencial de uso en futuras investigaciones.
Palabras clave: Debriefing/ Simulación/ Simulación de paciente/ Estudios de validación.
 

Abstract
Construction and Validation of the Simulation Debriefing Assessment Scale (Escala de Avaliação do Debriefing associado à Simulação - EADaS)

Background: Debriefing is a structured way for trainees to reflect on action, offering a reality, a way to see through their own eyes, the trainers' and their peers' eyes. Debriefing is an essential aspect of simulation, which should receive as much attention as the resolution of the scenario. A tool to assess the quality of the debriefing from the trainee's perspective is important for research and the continuous quality improvement.
Objectives: To construct and validate a simulation debriefing assessment scale.
Methodology: Methodological research study. A list of 50 items was developed based on the literature review and the researchers' experience, and applied as a questionnaire to 209 students of a Bachelor Degree in Nursing.
Results: After the analysis of the answers, a 34-item scale was designed, with high internal consistency (Alpha = 0.899). The factor analysis suggested a 3-factor solution, all of which with factors showing high Alpha values and rational significance.
Conclusion: The final version of the scale showed good psychometric properties with potential for use in future studies.
Key-words: Debriefing/ Simulation/ Patient simulation/ Validation studies.
 

Referências bibliográficas

Baldwin, K. (2007). Friday night in the pediatric emergency department: A simulated exercise to promote clinical reasoning in the classroom. Nurse Educator, 32(1), 24-29.

Campbell, S., & Daley, K. (2009). Simulation scenarios for nurse educators: Making it real. New York, NY: Springer.

Childs, J., & Sepples, S. (2006). Cllinical teaching by simulation: Lessons learned from a complex patient care scenario. Nusing Education Perspectives, 27(3), 154-158.

Dieckmann, P., Manser, T., Wehner, T., & Marcus, R. (2007). Reality and fiction cues in medical patient simulation. An interview study with anesthesiologists. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1(2), 148-168.

Dreifuerst, K. (2009). The essential of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 109-114.

Gaba, D., Howard, S., Fish, K., Smith, B., & Sowb, Y. (2001). Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Simulation e Gaming, 32(2), 175-193.

Gururaja, R., Yang, T., Paige, J., & Chauvin, S. (2008). Examining the effectiveness of debriefing at the point of care in simulation-based operating room team training. In K. Henriksen, J. Battles, M. Keyes, & M. Grady, Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches ( Vol. 3). Rockville, MD: Agency for the healthcare research and Quality. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK43676/

Heukelom, V., Begaz, T., & Treat, R. (2010). Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in simulation debriefing i medical simulation. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Helthcare, 5(2), 91-97.

Hodges, B. (2006). Medical education and the maintenance of incompetence. Medical Teacher, 28(8), 690-696.

Jeffries, P. (2007). Simulation in nursing education:from conceptualization to evaluation. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.

Jeffries, P., & Rizzolo, A. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: A National, multi-site, multi-method study. In P. Jeffries (Ed.), Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. (pp.147- 159). New York, NY: National League for Nursing.

Kardong-Edgren, S., Starkweather, A., & Ward, L. (2008). The integration of simulation into a clinical foundations of nursing course: Student and faculty perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1),1-16.

Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11),496-503.

Loewenthal, K. (2001). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. Hove, Reino Unido: Psychological Press.

Martins, J. (2009). Atuação do enfermeiro no sector de urgencias: Gestão para o desenvolvimento de competencias. In W. Malagutti & K. Cardoso, Gestão do serviço de enfermagem no mundo globalizado (pp. 175-189). Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Rubio.

Martins, J., Mazzo, A., Baptista, R., Coutinho, V., Gody, S., Mendes, I., & Trevizan, M. (2012). The simulated clinical experience in nursing education: A historical review. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 25(4), 619-625.

Overstreet, M. (2009). The current practice of nursing clinical simulation debriefing: A multiple case study (Tese de Doutoramento). Recuperado de https://trace.tennessee.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1696&context=utk_graddiss

Rodrigues, M., & Baia, M. ( 2012). Mediação e acompanhamento na formação, educação e desenvolvimento profissional. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 3(7),199-205.

Shinnick, M., Horwich, T., & Steadman, R. (2011). Debriefing: The most importante component in simulation? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(3),105-111.

Warrick, D., Hunsaker, P., Cook, C., & Altman, S. (1979). Debriefing experiential learning exercises. Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation, 1(2), 91-100.

RECURSOS CUIDEN

RECURSOS CIBERINDEX

FUNDACION INDEX

GRUPOS DE INVESTIGACION

¿Quiénes somos?
RICO Red de Centros Colaboradores
Convenios
Casa de Mágina
MINERVA Jóvenes investigadores
Publicaciones
Consultoría