ENTRAR            

 


 

PARANINFO DIGITAL INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comentar este texto

Ir a Sumario

Documento anterior

Documento siguiente

Enviar correo al autor

Sin T�tulo


Modalidad de presentación:
comunicación digital

 

REF.: 160d

Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Attitudes to Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: An exploratory approach
Rui Pedro Gomes Pereira,1 Maria José da Silva Peixoto de Oliveira Cardoso,2 Maria Alice Correia Santos Cardoso Martins3
(1) Nursing School, University of Minho. Braga, Portugal. (2) Porto Nursing School. Porto, Portugal. (3) Local Health Unit - Matosinhos. Matosinhos, Portugal

Rev Paraninfo digital, 2013: 19

Cómo citar este documento
Pereira, Rui Pedro Gomes; Cardoso, Maria José da Silva Peixoto de Oliveira; Martins, Maria Alice Correia Santos Cardoso. Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Attitudes to Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: An exploratory approach. Rev Paraninfo Digital, 2013; 19. Disponible en: <https://www.index-f.com/para/n19/160d.php> Consultado el 18 de Abril del 2024

ABSTRACT

Background: The lack of cultural and linguistically sensitive instruments prevents the opportunity of assessing attitudes and barriers of health care staff towards evidence-based practice. The aim of this communication is to report the validation process in the Portuguese context of the Attitudes to Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire.
Methods: We developed a cross-sectional, descriptive psychometric validation study. For cultural adaptation, a bidirectional translation was carried out, accordingly to common standards. To determine the psychometric properties of the questionnaire we conducted a Principal Component Analysis with Varimax orthogonal rotation. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by Cronbach's alpha.
Results: We obtained 244 valid questionnaires with a 64.2% response rate. Data collected explained that the questionnaire showed an acceptable internal consistency (a = .63). Subjected the questionnaire to a principal components analysis using Varimax method, we obtained eight dimensions that explain 56.66% of total variance.
Conclusions: The exploratory factorial analysis conducted demonstrated valid empiric evidence and the questionnaire could be used in our context.

Bibliografía

1. Dicenso A, Cullum N, Ciliska D. Implementing evidence based nursing: some misconceptions. Evidence Based Nursing, Vol. 1, nº 2, p. 38-40, 1998.
2. Chien WT. A survey of nurses� perceived barriers to research utilization in Hong Kong. Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 19, nº 23/24, p. 3584-3586 2010.
3. Kajermo KN, Boström A-M, Thompson DS, Hutchinson AM, Estabrooks CA, Wallin L. The BARRIERS scale - the barriers to research utilization scale: a systematic review. Implementation Science, Vol. 5, nº 1, p. 32-54, 2010.
4. Moreno-Casbas T, Fuentelsaz-Gallegoa C, González-María E, Miguel AG. Barreras para la utilización de la investigación. Estudio descriptivo en profesionales de enfermería de la práctica clínica y en investigadores activos. Enfermería Clínica, Vol. 20, nº 3, p. 153-164, 2010.
5. Brown CE, Wickline MA, Ecoff L, Glaser D:  Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical center. Vol. 65, nº 2, p. 371-381, 2009.
6. Karkos B, Peters, K. A magnet community hospital: fewer barriers to nursing research utilization. Journal of Nursing Administration., Vol. 36, nº 7/8, p. 377-382, 2006.
7. Fink R, Thompson C, Bonnes D. Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, Vol. 35, nº 3, p. 121-129, 2005.
8. Hutchinson A, Johnston, L. Bridging the divide: a survey of nurse�s opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 13, nº 3, p. 304-315, 2004.
9. Eastbrooks C, Winther C, Derksen L. Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the research utilization   literature in nursing. Nursing Research, Vol. 53, nº 5, p. 293-303, 2004.
10. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. BARRIERS: The barriers to research utilization scale. Applied Nursing Research, 4(1), 39-45, 1991.
11. Vilelas J, Basto ML. Validação para a Língua Portuguesa da Escala de Funck et. al.,�Barreiras à Utilização da Investigação�. Pensar Enfermagem, Vol. 15, nº 1, p. 25-38, 2011.
12. Pereira RP, Cardoso MJ, Martins MA. Atitudes e barreiras à prática de enfermagem baseada na evidência em contexto comunitário. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, III Série, nº7, p. 55-62, 2012.
13. Mckenna H, Ashton S, Keeney S. Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 45, nº 2, p. 178-189, 2004.
14. Polit DF, Beck, CT, Hungler BP. Fundamentos de Pesquisa em Enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização. 5 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2004.
15. Ribeiro JL, Ponte AC. Propriedades métricas da versão portuguesa da escala de Suporte Social do MOS (MOS Social Support Survey) com Idosos. Psicologia Saúde & Doenças, 10 (2),163-174, 2009.

Principio de p᧩na
error on connection