ENTRAR            

INSTRUMENTOS

Estudios de validación de instrumentos de medición en lactancia materna

Michelline Santos de França,¹ Luciana Pedrosa Leal,¹ Cleide Maria Pontes^1
1Programa de Postgrado en Enfermería, Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil

Manuscrito recibido el 4.5.2015
Manuscrito aceptado el 23.12.2015

Index de Enfermería [Index Enferm] 2017; 26(1-2): 77-81

Cómo citar este documento

Resumen

Objetivo: Identificar las características metodológicas de los estudios de desarrollo y validación de herramientas auto-aplicadas para medición de las actitudes, experiencias y satisfacción de la mujer/nutriz en lactancia materna. Método: Revisión integrativa de literatura a través de búsqueda en las bases de datos CUIDEN, MEDLINE, SCOPUS y CINAHL utilizando los términos "Validación" y "Lactancia materna". Los estudios que atendieron a criterios de inclusión fueron sometidos a la evaluación del rigor metodológico antes de ser seleccionados para conformar la revisión. Resultados: La construcción de los instrumentos se basó en revisión de literatura, teoría y reformulación de ítems de instrumentos preexistentes. La validación de contenido se efectuó por evaluación de especialistas. Las pruebas psicométricas realizadas variaron entre los estudios. Conclusión: Varios son los métodos utilizados para validar instrumentos de medición, los investigadores deben elegir el más adecuado para sus objetivos a partir de la responsabilidad de asegurar a los usuarios una herramienta de calidad.
Palabras clave: Estudios de validación/ Lactancia materna/ Revisión.

Abstract (Validation studies of measuring instruments in breastfeeding)

Objective: To identify the methodological characteristics of the development and validation studies of self-applied tools for measurement of attitudes, experiences and satisfaction with breastfeeding. Methods: Integrative literature review by searching the CUIDEN, MEDLINE, SCOPUS and CINAHL database using the terms "Validation" and "Breastfeeding". Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological rigor before being selected for the review.Results: The instruments construction was based on literature review, theory and existing tools items reformulation. The content validation is given by experts evaluation. Psychometric tests performed varied between studies. Conclusions: There are many methods used to validate measurement instruments, it is up to researchers choose the most suitable for your purposes from the users responsibility to ensure a quality tool.
Key-words: Validation studies/ Breastfeeding/ Review.

Bibliografía

1. Eidelman AI, Schanler RJ. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(3):827-841.
2. OMS - Organização Mundial da Saúde. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. Evidências científicas dos dez passos para o sucesso no aleitamento materno. Brasília; 2001.
3. Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;15(8):1-42.
4. Ekstrom A, Kylberg E, Nissen E. A Process-Oriented Breastfeeding Training Program for Healthcare Professionals to Promote Breastfeeding: An Intervention Study. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2012; 7(2):85-92.
5. Imada TCML, Mamede MV, Souza L, Biffi RG. Family Dynamics Measure II adaptation and validation to family members of women with breast cancer. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. 2010; 26(3):557-564.
6. Lima TC, Gallani MCBJ, Freitas MIP. Validação do conteúdo de instrumento para caracterizar pessoas maiores de 50 anos portadoras do Vírus da Imunodeficiência Humana/Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida. Acta Paul. Enferm. 2012; 25(1):4-10. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-21002012000100002&script=sci_arttext [acceso: 01/09/2013].
7. Polit DF, Beck CT, Hungler BP. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização. 7ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2011.
8. Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein 2010;8(1):102-6.
9. Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto-Enferm. 2008;17(4):758-64.
10. Ursi ES. Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: revisão integrativa da literatura. [dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto; 2005.
11. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) - Programa de habilidades em leitura crítica. Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust, 2013.
12. Mulder PJ, Johnson TS. The Beginning Breastfeeding Survey: measuring mothers' perceptions of breastfeeding effectiveness during the postpartum hospitalization. Res Nurs Health. 2010; 33(4):329-44.
13. Grassley JS, Spencer BS, Bryson D. The development and psychometric testing of the Supportive Needs of Adolescents Breastfeeding Scale. J Adv Nurs. 2013; 69(3): 708-16.
14. Rojjanasrirat W, Wambach KA, Sousa VD, Gajewski BJ. Psychometric evaluation of the Employer Support for Breastfeeding Questionnaire (ESBQ). J Hum Lact. 2010; 26(3): 286-96.
15. Bai Y, Peng CY, Fly AD. Validation of a short questionnaire to assess mothers' perception of workplace breastfeeding support. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008; 108(7):1221-5.
16. Wells KJ, Thompson NJ, Kloeblen-Tarver AS. Development and psychometric testing of the prenatal breast-feeding self-efficacy scale. Am J Health Behav. 2006; 30(2): 177-87.
17. Maslow, H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 1943; 50: 370-396.
18. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1992; 50:179-211.
19. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Chffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1986.
20. House JS. Work Stress and Social Support. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 1981.
21. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4thed. New York: Oxford Press; 2008.
22. Wolf RM. Questionnaires. Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: an International Handbook. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1997.
23. Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. 4ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2011.
24. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986; 35(1):382-385.
25. Bornstein MH, Haynes OM, Azuma H, Galperin C, Maital S, Ogino M, et al. A cross-national study of self-evaluations and attributions in parenting: Argentina, Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, and the United States. Developmental Psychology. 1998; 34(4):662-676.
26. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity índex: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29(5):489-97.
27. Barboza EMF. A linguagem clara em conteúdos de websites governamentais para promover a acessibilidade a cidadãos com baixo nível de escolaridade. Inc. Soc. 2010; 4(1):52-66.
28. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to practice. 2ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallHealth, 2000.
29. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
30. LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação crítica e utilização. 4ed. Rio de Janeiro. Guanabara Koogan; 2001.
31. Sánchez CR, Alonso SRL. ¿Es válida la adaptación española de la Escala de Entorno de Práctica Enfermera del Nursing Work Index para Atención Primaria? Index de Enfermería 2014; 23(3): 188-190. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962014000200016&lng=es [acceso: 08/01/2016].
32. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Análise multivariada de dados. 6ed. Porto Alegre. Bookman; 2009.
33. Hattie J, Cooksey R. Procedures for assessing the validity of tests using the "known-groups" method. Applied Psychological Measurement 1984; 8: 295-306.
34. Pasquali L. Psicometria. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2009; 43(spe):992-999.
35. Myers K, Winters NC. Ten-year review of rating scales. I: Overview of scale functioning, psychometric properties, and selection. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2002; 41(2):114-122.
36. Pérez FN. Enfermería Basada en Evidencia y Transferencia de Conocimiento. Index de Enferme-ría 2015; 24(1-2): 5-6. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962015000100001&lng=es [acceso: 08/01/2016].

RECURSOS CUIDEN

RECURSOS CIBERINDEX

FUNDACION INDEX

GRUPOS DE INVESTIGACION

¿Quiénes somos?
RICO Red de Centros Colaboradores
Convenios
Casa de Mágina
MINERVA Jóvenes investigadores
Publicaciones
Consultoría